Money Systems Transparency Alliance MSTA: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{NBS}}https://www.moneytransparency.com/<Br> == Thinking About the Definition of Money == If money is a measure it cannot also be a tradable commodity and if it is a tradabl..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NBS}}https://www.moneytransparency.com/<Br> | {{NBS}}https://www.moneytransparency.com/<Br> | ||
{{SRP}} | |||
== Thinking About the Definition of Money == | == Thinking About the Definition of Money == | ||
If money is a measure it cannot also be a tradable commodity and if it is a tradable commodity, it cannot also be a measure. | If money is a measure it cannot also be a tradable commodity and if it is a tradable commodity, it cannot also be a measure. | ||
Revision as of 23:34, 9 October 2018
https://www.moneytransparency.com/
Thinking About the Definition of Money
If money is a measure it cannot also be a tradable commodity and if it is a tradable commodity, it cannot also be a measure.
- currently, there is no consensus on any clear and unambiguous logical definition of money, which is required in order to determine the validity of contracts in which money is an object.
- When, even leading experts such a Kocherlakota and others dispute what money is and the de facto assumption adopted in practice, of money being both a commodity and a measure, is logically inconsistent, then it becomes clear that money is neither defined adequately nor is being represented correctly in practice.