Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Is-Event"
(→Ok, let's leave it as it is.) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This category Is-Event doesn't even have anything in it, and it's too broad. Who would want such a list? I would keep the event categories as they are and perhaps add a cat to capture events that don't recur, like maybe Is-One_Time_Event, something like that. ~[[User:PaulSank|Paul]] | This category Is-Event doesn't even have anything in it, and it's too broad. Who would want such a list? I would keep the event categories as they are and perhaps add a cat to capture events that don't recur, like maybe Is-One_Time_Event, something like that. ~[[User:PaulSank|Paul]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| − | + | Ok, let's leave it as it is. | |
| − | I agree that it's make work to change it. Let's leave Is-Event with the two pointers.[[User:Stan|Stan]] | + | I agree that it's make work to change it. Let's leave Is-Event with the two pointers.[[User:Stan|Stan]] |
Revision as of 04:52, 28 March 2017
We might consider listing all events here and removing Is-Annual Event and Is-Recurring Event because the category Frequency deals effectively with the timing issue. ~Stan
It just sounds like extra work to me.
I think annual events are important enough to have their own category. Yeah, I can see that I've built this cat up to 41 pages. I don't want to have to go through 41 pages removing a category without a very powerful reason indeed. I see no harm or trouble in using three cats, Is-Annual_Event, Is-Recurring_Event, and Frequency-Annual for each such page.
This category Is-Event doesn't even have anything in it, and it's too broad. Who would want such a list? I would keep the event categories as they are and perhaps add a cat to capture events that don't recur, like maybe Is-One_Time_Event, something like that. ~Paul
Ok, let's leave it as it is.
I agree that it's make work to change it. Let's leave Is-Event with the two pointers.Stan
